On the lovely sunny afternoon of March 6, over forty people gathered in the Ukrainian Church Hall on Bagot Street to learn, share, and strategize about how to advocate for the Inner Harbour. Looking ahead to the “North King’s Town” Secondary Planning process the City will be starting this summer, we wanted to start drawing together ideas from community members about what we like about this area as it is, and what we might like to change.
In an introduction, we gave some basic background on the fight against the WSE, and shared an image of the Wellington X vision generated at a meeting about a year ago:
As you can see, this image shows how Wellington X sees the fight against the WSE in the context of other political and social goals. We oppose the WSE because we have affirmative appreciation of and hopes for the place we live. So we think we have a foundation for the broad approach that the Secondary Planning process will invite or demand.
In brainstorming discussions at the meeting, we asked about what people like about the neighbourhood. The goal was not to do a systematic survey at this point, but to get people thinking and conversing and weighing ideas. And there were a lot of ideas.
The three most-mentioned qualities were quiet, walkability, and a mix of different kinds of people. The fact that there isn’t a lot of traffic in the Inner Harbour came up again and again, and its effects that you can hear birds, allow your kids freedom, and spend peaceful time at the river. People really appreciate that people can walk to stores, schools, social services, jobs, parks, and to each others’ homes — and that they do. And they like that the neighbourhood has a mix of old-timers and newcomers, a range of skills and worldviews.
On this positive beginning, people did have suggestions for change. The number one issue seemed to be a desire for more trees, more greenspace, and more bike and walking paths through green space. “Not fancy greenspace,” perhaps even “more naturalized,” a number of people said. They wanted better maintenance of sidewalks and streets for those walking or cycling, and better connectivity or access to routes that already exist. A number of people also mentioned affordable housing as a desirable quality to maintain the neighbourhood’s diversity. Hopes were expressed that vacant buildings or lots currently undeveloped should be used for the community’s benefit.
My personal favourite idea was to open up the little creek that runs from Dufferin Street down under the play structure into the river. It’s buried now, but you can hear it when you near the bottom of the hill, and see the outlet pipe on the bank. Wouldn’t it be cool to bring it to the surface again?
People connected the WSE into the bigger picture in various ways. One person’s sticky note summed up the general perspective on the road’s effects: “more traffic, less park space, less friendly space, space people don’t go, not green, oil sand and salt in water, chase wildlife away.” Roads cut up community, people said. Tourists and new residents will want parks and greenspace just as much as we do, it was suggested.
While there was hope about the Secondary Planning process, people did note various obstacles. There was a widespread feeling that residents’ views are not really being listened to, in contrast with various financial interests. People are concerned that city staff seem to be committed to “1950s ideas” of growth, rather than sustainability. It is exhausting to resist this over and over, people observed, and it will be hard to keep our energy up.
As for me, I found this meeting energizing, and I hope others did as well. I hope we can continue to energize each other, to reach out to others, and to come up with and defend visions for the future of the place we live. This was a very auspicious start to the next stage of the fight against the WSE and for a sustainable and liveable “North King’s Town.”
— Laura Murray